Skip to main content

Battle Arena Toshinden 3

Happy 2020 everyone!  I figured I would kick the year off with a game that has nothing to do with 2020 in any way, shape or form.

I have to say, I had no idea this game existed.  I knew Battle Arena Toshinden got a sequel, but I didn’t realize it had two (actually three, the fourth game only came out in Japan and PAL regions).  The series is certainly obscure, it hasn’t had a new release in North America since 1997.  That being said, it’s a series that holds special place in PlayStation and general fighting game lore.  It was a PS1 launch title and the focus of many of Sony’s early ad campaigns.  It was also one of the first truly 3D fighting games and the first to have a sidestep button.  It may not have been the best game ever made, but it was an important one. 

When you think about it, it actually makes sense that this game would get a sequel.  A forward thinking, borderline revolutionary game with some flaws seems like the perfect candidate.  The controls were a little simplistic, it was limited in its combo engine and a little slow and stiff.  Iron out some of the flaws and you could have a true classic.  Unfortunately, that isn’t what happened.  BAT3 regressed in every possible way, to the point that it is almost unplayable.
Image result for battle arena toshinden 3

I guess the graphics were slightly improved.  The character models are smoother and everything is way less blocky.  Unfortunately, the backgrounds are drab and dull.  They may be a little more detailed, but gone are the bright colors and wide open environments of the first game.  Everything is cramped and claustrophobic, with all the action taking place inside enclosed areas for the first time in the series.  It’s difficult to explain, so here are some comparative screenshots:

Image result for battle arena toshinden 3 
vs.
Image result for battle arena toshinden
 

BAT3 may technically be “better,” but it looks substantially less appealing to the eye.

And the controls? Oh god the controls are abysmal.  You have to absolutely slam on the D-Pad just to get your fighter to take a step forward.  Everything is incredibly delayed and the attacks only register when the feel like it.  The dodge buttons are a little better, but it almost makes it worse that the sidesteps and dodges are so snappy and everything else is so unresponsive.  Each character has one button special moves, which is good because any special attacks that require a command are almost impossible to pull off successfully.  I should also mention that you can increase the frame rate to be faster at the expense of the graphics.  It’s only an option in theory, as the graphics aren’t that much worse and the low frame rate option makes an already slow game unplayable.

The worst offense here though is the sound.  As I’ve already discussed, the first Battle Arena Toshinden was a very flawed game. One thing it absolutely nailed though was the soundtrack.  It’s incredible and its one of the things that really showed what the PS1 was capable of.  The voice samples weren’t perfect, but they were pretty solid as well and all of the voices fit their characters.  But BAT3 did a complete 180.  The soundtrack is boring at best and terrible at worst.  It’s barely audible in most cases and what you can hear just isn’t good.  They even recycle tracks from the first game which stand out for all the wrong reasons.  The voice samples are even worse, none of the characters sound good and none of the voices are fitting at all.  Ellis is supposed to be a 20-year-old former ballerina, why does she sound like she’s been smoking a pack a day for the last 30 years?

I can’t say the updates are all bad.  One of the biggest issues with the first game was the limited roster and BAT3 has nearly double the characters unlocked from the start.  It also has tons of unlockable characters, which is nice to see in a fighting game.  None of the unlockable characters are interesting, but at least they aren’t just palette swaps.  There are also a few more modes, whereas the first game just had arcade and versus.  There’s also more of a storyline here, so that’s a positive even if that isn’t that important in a fighting games.

But at the end of the day, adding more stuff isn’t that helpful if you just add more stuff to a game that already sucks.  The first BAT game is an interesting curiosity that is fun to play through for nostaliga’s sake, but BAT3 isn’t worth your time.  After playing this, I see exactly why the series died out (and from what I hear, the 4th game is even worse), especially when compared to franchise starters like Soul Blade/Edge.  I see little to no redeeming qualities here, avoid.

3/10

Play this if:
You like unlocking fighting game characters
You care about the storyline of a fighting game that hasn’t had a new entry in 25 years.

Avoid if:
You prefer fighting games where the characters do what you tell them to
You don’t have time to wait a half hour for a video game character to walk across the screen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 10s: Might and Magic VI: The Mandate of Heaven

When I first started writing about games, I was very hesitant to include PC titles at all. As I've said numerous times before, it's just not something I've ever really felt qualified to talk about. There are so many iconic PC games that were just blind spots for me as I never really actively sought them out. If it didn't come on a PC Gamer demo disc or I didn't hear about it through word of mouth, I didn't know about it. Does anyone else remember those PC Gamer demo discs? I had as much fun playing with the UI on them as I did any of the actual demos. Maybe if I spent less time clicking around the secret underground club and more on actually playing the games, I would have had more PC experience. Eh, I'm okay with the fact that while Fallout and Diablo weren't nearly as critical a part of my early gaming life as Coconut Monkey. Even when I did play and enjoy PC games, it was typically because I played the console versions first. Games like Doom, Command

Terranigma

  As usual, it took way longer than it should have, but I did EVENTUALLY do exactly what I said I was going to. It's a year late, but I've finally made my way through the Quintet trilogy. Playing these three games became a stated goal of mine since I started podcasting last year. One of my earliest episodes covered Soul Blazer, the first title in the pseudo series. The second game, Illusion of Gaia, was also a landmark episode as it was the first one to include the intro song ("A Glass Half Full of Tears" by Aura Blaze, who's music you should check out here ). Both of them received pretty solid scores, though I didn't quite like the latter quite as much as a lot of people seem to. After all these years, I'm still surprised I never played these games when they came out. Both were definitely right up my alley and readily available to buy or even rent at my local video store, but I just never picked them up. It's a little more understandable that I had ne

Lost Odyssey: Part 2

Last week, we started our look at Lost Odyssey, a title that seemed to break unwritten rules of gaming left and right. We have a traditional RPG, which is the brainchild of the creator of Final Fantasy, released for XBox, a console not known for the genre, at a time when said genre was at what felt like the absolute bottom of its popularity. We started with the story, characters and world, all of which I thought were really good to great. That's a great start for an RPG, where those aspects are very important. But all of that can be undone if the gameplay isn't up to par. It's critical in any generation, but this is an essential aspect to call out in 7th gen RPGs. There was a lot of experimentation going on in the genre at the time, a lot of which didn't yield positive results. I guess I get it, the genre wasn't doing well at the time and developers were trying to do anything they could to bring it back to relevance. Sometimes, that meant terrible gimmicks. Other ti