Skip to main content

Toy Story


Here's another one from the Joey file.

He has been obssesed, like OBSSESED with Toy Story for the past few months.  And not just the first movie either.  I have probably seen all four of the Toy Story films ten times a week for the past several months.  I guess it could be worse.  There are a lot of lousy kids shows and movies out there that have no redeeming qualities for parents so at least I'm not watching those over and over again.

It says a lot for these movies, at least the first two, that the mere mention of them doesn't make me cringe at this point.  I think almost everyone would agree, the original Toy Story is a classic.  Computer-animated films are almost guaranteed money now, but Pixar took a huge risk when they released it in 1995.  The risk paid off 1000-fold.  Pixar is now a household name and movies like this are everywhere.  That all started with Toy Story, which was the first fully computer animated feature film.  The second wasn't revolutionary by any means, but I think it's a great film.  I'm a collector myself, so something about it spoke to me.  I don't understand the Oscar level love for the third film.  It's a good movie, but it's almost as if Pixar got so caught up in their own hype they almost forgot that this was supposed to be a series of kids' movies.  I'm sorry, but Toy Story 3 is an absolutely depressing, soul crushing film, too much so for little ones.  Finally, there's the fourth movie, which was basically just Pixar being like "hey, we like money, let's make another Toy Story!"

And unfortunately, that's what the video game was as well.  Remember when I talked about licensed movie tie-ins during the Golden Compass review?  The Toy Story video game is a picture perfect definition of a shameless cash grab designed to capitalize off the success of the movie.  There are parts of the game that are borderline interesting and I have to give them credit for at least trying to provide gameplay variety.  But much of the deviation from the standard platforming levels is unwelcome and forces you to contend with awkward controls and poor design.  The platforming levels are difficulty appropriate for the target audience, but some of these other levels are...less so.  Even in the platforming stages, there is too much inconsistency and frustration to warrant much more than a playthrough.  Full disclosure, I played the SNES version of Toy Story.  There is a Genesis version as well, but the two games are functionally similar.

There are some positives here.  For one, they actually followed the plot of the movie.  That wasn't always a given with licensed games at the time, so it was nice to see here.  The graphics are pretty good, at least in the SNES version.  The game captures the movie's visiual style well and the character animations are smooth, even if they have weird, choppy outlines around them.  All the toys are here, you play as Woody and spend much of the game with Buzz as the antagonist.  Other toys like Ham, Mr. Potato Head, Rex and a variety of Sid's "mutant" toys are their to both help and hinder you.  The game hits all the high points from the Buzz showing up in Andy's room unexpectedly to Pizza Planet to the escape from Sid's and still images and text help progress the plot.  That's okay, it's not video but its the best these consoles could do.  It also features some pretty good sound and includes tracks from Randy Newman's score as well as some originals.  There are no lyrics or anything, but you can tell exactly which songs you are listening to, which, again, didn't always happen in this era.

The level design is incredibly simplistic, its just a stright line with some shelves to jump on.  I can't knock them too hard for that, it is a game directed at kids, but it would have been nice to see a little imagination.  The enemies are all generic toy trains and planes, though sometimes the other toys can damage you.  Woody can jump, though not very high, and his lone attack is swinging his pull-string.  This is where the hit detection problems start to become very noticeable.  You absolutely have to hit enemies with the end of the string, if they end up in the middle your attack won't work.  That gets very old, very fast.  The frustration is compounded because the planes don't every actually disappear from the screen when you hit them, so you never know when they are safe to walk past or they will damage you.  The hitboxes are also inconsistent, I was never able to tell when I was going to take a hit or when I was okay.  At least they are consistently inconsistent, the opposite happened too where I was like "welp, I'm dead" and an enemy went right through me.

While I was able to use that logic to combat my frustration, it's unlikely the target audience would have been able to do the same.  Remember, this is a game for kids and those are the kinds of things that are inaccessible to young gamers.  The problems with hit detection are especially prevalent in the chase levels, of which there are two.  These were the only parts of the game where I struggled, largely because I was never sure when or where I was going to take a hit.  I can't imagine a kid playing through these without getting upset.  Ditto the non platforming levels, especially the one where you control RC Car from an overhead view.  It's bad enough that the game doesn't tell you how to control yourself, but it's damn near impossible to actually go where you are supposed to.  I appreciate that they wanted to add more variety, but this was just bad.  It's kind of a shame, because they actually did do a good job of setting the right difficulty in other sections.  For one, you don't die when you fall into a pit, but you do take a point of damage.  This was a smart design choice for a kids game as pit deaths are always frustrating.  But a lot of games for younger gamers go too far with this and don't include pits at all, which negates any semblance of challenge at all.  The boss first boss fight against Buzz is actually a great "boss fight 101" for someone who's picking up a controller for the first time.  It's a basic pattern that would be just challenging enough for a kid, but not so difficult that they would get stuck.

It really is a shame there were so many technical flaws in Toy Story (the game).  They did a lot of things right in terms of balancing difficulty and following the film, but the hit detection issues and frustrating controls bury it.  If just a little more care was taken to get these basic things right, we might have had a hidden gem on our hands.  Instead, this game is relegated to the ever-growing pile of licensed schlock that plagues the game industry.  I guess it's not that bad, but you can tell what they were going for and making a good game wasn't it.  It's certainly not the worst video game I ever played and it was even enjoyable at times, but its far from worth playing today.  I guess I may as well watch the movie (again) instead.

4/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 10s: Might and Magic VI: The Mandate of Heaven

When I first started writing about games, I was very hesitant to include PC titles at all. As I've said numerous times before, it's just not something I've ever really felt qualified to talk about. There are so many iconic PC games that were just blind spots for me as I never really actively sought them out. If it didn't come on a PC Gamer demo disc or I didn't hear about it through word of mouth, I didn't know about it. Does anyone else remember those PC Gamer demo discs? I had as much fun playing with the UI on them as I did any of the actual demos. Maybe if I spent less time clicking around the secret underground club and more on actually playing the games, I would have had more PC experience. Eh, I'm okay with the fact that while Fallout and Diablo weren't nearly as critical a part of my early gaming life as Coconut Monkey. Even when I did play and enjoy PC games, it was typically because I played the console versions first. Games like Doom, Command

Terranigma

  As usual, it took way longer than it should have, but I did EVENTUALLY do exactly what I said I was going to. It's a year late, but I've finally made my way through the Quintet trilogy. Playing these three games became a stated goal of mine since I started podcasting last year. One of my earliest episodes covered Soul Blazer, the first title in the pseudo series. The second game, Illusion of Gaia, was also a landmark episode as it was the first one to include the intro song ("A Glass Half Full of Tears" by Aura Blaze, who's music you should check out here ). Both of them received pretty solid scores, though I didn't quite like the latter quite as much as a lot of people seem to. After all these years, I'm still surprised I never played these games when they came out. Both were definitely right up my alley and readily available to buy or even rent at my local video store, but I just never picked them up. It's a little more understandable that I had ne

Lost Odyssey: Part 2

Last week, we started our look at Lost Odyssey, a title that seemed to break unwritten rules of gaming left and right. We have a traditional RPG, which is the brainchild of the creator of Final Fantasy, released for XBox, a console not known for the genre, at a time when said genre was at what felt like the absolute bottom of its popularity. We started with the story, characters and world, all of which I thought were really good to great. That's a great start for an RPG, where those aspects are very important. But all of that can be undone if the gameplay isn't up to par. It's critical in any generation, but this is an essential aspect to call out in 7th gen RPGs. There was a lot of experimentation going on in the genre at the time, a lot of which didn't yield positive results. I guess I get it, the genre wasn't doing well at the time and developers were trying to do anything they could to bring it back to relevance. Sometimes, that meant terrible gimmicks. Other ti