Skip to main content

Toy Story


Here's another one from the Joey file.

He has been obssesed, like OBSSESED with Toy Story for the past few months.  And not just the first movie either.  I have probably seen all four of the Toy Story films ten times a week for the past several months.  I guess it could be worse.  There are a lot of lousy kids shows and movies out there that have no redeeming qualities for parents so at least I'm not watching those over and over again.

It says a lot for these movies, at least the first two, that the mere mention of them doesn't make me cringe at this point.  I think almost everyone would agree, the original Toy Story is a classic.  Computer-animated films are almost guaranteed money now, but Pixar took a huge risk when they released it in 1995.  The risk paid off 1000-fold.  Pixar is now a household name and movies like this are everywhere.  That all started with Toy Story, which was the first fully computer animated feature film.  The second wasn't revolutionary by any means, but I think it's a great film.  I'm a collector myself, so something about it spoke to me.  I don't understand the Oscar level love for the third film.  It's a good movie, but it's almost as if Pixar got so caught up in their own hype they almost forgot that this was supposed to be a series of kids' movies.  I'm sorry, but Toy Story 3 is an absolutely depressing, soul crushing film, too much so for little ones.  Finally, there's the fourth movie, which was basically just Pixar being like "hey, we like money, let's make another Toy Story!"

And unfortunately, that's what the video game was as well.  Remember when I talked about licensed movie tie-ins during the Golden Compass review?  The Toy Story video game is a picture perfect definition of a shameless cash grab designed to capitalize off the success of the movie.  There are parts of the game that are borderline interesting and I have to give them credit for at least trying to provide gameplay variety.  But much of the deviation from the standard platforming levels is unwelcome and forces you to contend with awkward controls and poor design.  The platforming levels are difficulty appropriate for the target audience, but some of these other levels are...less so.  Even in the platforming stages, there is too much inconsistency and frustration to warrant much more than a playthrough.  Full disclosure, I played the SNES version of Toy Story.  There is a Genesis version as well, but the two games are functionally similar.

There are some positives here.  For one, they actually followed the plot of the movie.  That wasn't always a given with licensed games at the time, so it was nice to see here.  The graphics are pretty good, at least in the SNES version.  The game captures the movie's visiual style well and the character animations are smooth, even if they have weird, choppy outlines around them.  All the toys are here, you play as Woody and spend much of the game with Buzz as the antagonist.  Other toys like Ham, Mr. Potato Head, Rex and a variety of Sid's "mutant" toys are their to both help and hinder you.  The game hits all the high points from the Buzz showing up in Andy's room unexpectedly to Pizza Planet to the escape from Sid's and still images and text help progress the plot.  That's okay, it's not video but its the best these consoles could do.  It also features some pretty good sound and includes tracks from Randy Newman's score as well as some originals.  There are no lyrics or anything, but you can tell exactly which songs you are listening to, which, again, didn't always happen in this era.

The level design is incredibly simplistic, its just a stright line with some shelves to jump on.  I can't knock them too hard for that, it is a game directed at kids, but it would have been nice to see a little imagination.  The enemies are all generic toy trains and planes, though sometimes the other toys can damage you.  Woody can jump, though not very high, and his lone attack is swinging his pull-string.  This is where the hit detection problems start to become very noticeable.  You absolutely have to hit enemies with the end of the string, if they end up in the middle your attack won't work.  That gets very old, very fast.  The frustration is compounded because the planes don't every actually disappear from the screen when you hit them, so you never know when they are safe to walk past or they will damage you.  The hitboxes are also inconsistent, I was never able to tell when I was going to take a hit or when I was okay.  At least they are consistently inconsistent, the opposite happened too where I was like "welp, I'm dead" and an enemy went right through me.

While I was able to use that logic to combat my frustration, it's unlikely the target audience would have been able to do the same.  Remember, this is a game for kids and those are the kinds of things that are inaccessible to young gamers.  The problems with hit detection are especially prevalent in the chase levels, of which there are two.  These were the only parts of the game where I struggled, largely because I was never sure when or where I was going to take a hit.  I can't imagine a kid playing through these without getting upset.  Ditto the non platforming levels, especially the one where you control RC Car from an overhead view.  It's bad enough that the game doesn't tell you how to control yourself, but it's damn near impossible to actually go where you are supposed to.  I appreciate that they wanted to add more variety, but this was just bad.  It's kind of a shame, because they actually did do a good job of setting the right difficulty in other sections.  For one, you don't die when you fall into a pit, but you do take a point of damage.  This was a smart design choice for a kids game as pit deaths are always frustrating.  But a lot of games for younger gamers go too far with this and don't include pits at all, which negates any semblance of challenge at all.  The boss first boss fight against Buzz is actually a great "boss fight 101" for someone who's picking up a controller for the first time.  It's a basic pattern that would be just challenging enough for a kid, but not so difficult that they would get stuck.

It really is a shame there were so many technical flaws in Toy Story (the game).  They did a lot of things right in terms of balancing difficulty and following the film, but the hit detection issues and frustrating controls bury it.  If just a little more care was taken to get these basic things right, we might have had a hidden gem on our hands.  Instead, this game is relegated to the ever-growing pile of licensed schlock that plagues the game industry.  I guess it's not that bad, but you can tell what they were going for and making a good game wasn't it.  It's certainly not the worst video game I ever played and it was even enjoyable at times, but its far from worth playing today.  I guess I may as well watch the movie (again) instead.

4/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alex Kidd in Miracle World

I've been skirting around it for a few years now, but its finally time to add yet another console to the list. A few years ago, I reviewed Alex Kidd in the Enchanted Castle, a Genesis platformer that I didn't really enjoy all that much. I talked a little bit about how Alex Kidd was Sega's mascot before Sonic became a thing and how hyped up I was to give AKITEC a try, having heard so much about the series. That was part of the reason the game fell flat for me, though poor level design and awful boss fights were more than likely the bigger culprits. What I didn't realize at the time was that much of the positive sentiment I had heard about the series had nothing to do with its lone Genesis entry. Instead, much of the positivity was focused on the various entries on Sega's third generation console, a machine that I have been looking for an excuse to play for a long time. For most North American gamers, the Genesis was the first time we interacted with Sega. Many peop...

Valkyrie Profile: Part 1

Since I started creating gaming content, I've promised myself and the few readers I have that I was going to be as honest as possible. I'm going to do that, even if it gets me in trouble. While I try to avoid really ridiculous hot takes, I'm going to absolutely call out games that I don't really like, even if they are otherwise popular. That goes for the popular selections for "hidden gems" or "underrated" games as well. I don't do it often, but I certainly have demonstrated that I have no problem doing it. I did it relatively recently with Yoshi's Island and I've done it in the past with other games like Alundra or Jet Grind Radio. Some of those games I've liked, just not as much as others. Some of them I have actively disliked despite how well regarded they are. Sometimes I get why these games are so beloved (I hated the controls in Yoshi's Island but my goodness is it beautiful and unique). Other times, I don't (Alundra is...

Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance

It's time to keep the GBA Metroidvania train rolling. We started with Castlevania, then moved on to Metroid, and now it's time to make our way back to Dracula's castle. I was pleasantly surprised last year when I, sort of on a whim, decided to take a shot at Castlevania: Circle of the Moon on the Game Boy Advance. I had heard good things about the handheld titles in the series, but never actually took the time to play any of them. And that's a shame, because Circle of the Moon was outstanding. It was truly an exceptional example of just what the tiny but mighty GBA was capable of. It got me excited to dig into the other games in the genre I had missed from that console, both Metroid and Castlevania alike. I moved right along to Metroid: Zero Mission and while I wasn't as high on it as I was COTM, it was still a solid experience that was incredibly well designed and polished. So naturally, the next step in the progression was back to 'Vania with the next in that...