Skip to main content

High Score

So I'm going to mix it up this week.

I'm not really a big tv/movie person, but when I heard there was going to be a documentary miniseries about the history of video games, I had to check it out.  At this point, there are thousands of different pieces of media that chronicle the history of gaming. Video games are here to stay, a multi-billion dollar industry that has mainstream appeal and coverage.

I don't think High Score breaks any new ground.  It does a lot of things well and in many ways, it does a good job of not trying to do too much.  The history of gaming as we know it today isn't particularly long, but it's very complicated.  There was no way they were going to cover it all in six episodes, they probably wouldn't have been able to do it in 12. A lot of that history isn't pretty, so covering some of that stuff would require proper handling and I understand why they elected to just skip over some of it.  But overall, I think they did a good job.

First and foremost, it's incredibly well made. I absolutely loved the pixel art style graphics they used to tell some of the high points of the stories.  I mean, what else were you going to use?  It really made the series stand out from other gaming related docs. I especially liked when they incorporated it into real world footage. It was clear that a lot of thought went into the presentation, and not just with the digitized sections. The interview segments look great and they did a really good job deciding when to include old footage.  

The series is broken into six episodes, each discussing a different point in gaming history. There is little to no discussion of the really early stuff like radar equipment games or even the Magnavox Odyssey. It starts with the late 70's/early 80's and picks up from there, probably the right call for a series with a more "fun" tone and a less informative one.  Most of the focus is on console gaming, but computer games, especially early ones, do get some love as well. Most of the episodes focus primarily on one subject and those do seem a bit random.  It was cool to see an RPG episode for me personally, but not everyone would feel that way.  I also find it weird that Sega had almost an entire episode dedicated to its rise while Nintendo didn't. 

That leads me to the biggest problem with High Score: inconsistency.  The Sega episode goes into great detail about how the Genesis came to be, the five point plan to make it a success in the U.S. and how they became a gaming heavyweight. The rise of the NES and the origin of Mario get far less fanfare, though the series focuses pretty heavily on Donkey Kong. Maybe it's because they thought people had heard that story enough?  I get that Sega's marketing campaigns were revolutionary, but that doesn't change the fact that Nintendo had more long term appeal.  Remember, only one of those companies actually still makes gaming consoles.  Other major events/major talking points are glossed over, including the not-so-great work culture at Atari, the gaming crash and the senate hearings on violent games. The latter is discussed in the fifth episode, but it really should have gotten its own.

I think a lot of the problem comes from having too much content for their own good. For one, the list of interviews they landed is incredibly impressive. Becky Heineman, Nolan Bushnell, Roberta Williams, Yoshitaka Amano, John Tobias, Toru Iwatani and many others lend their insight to High Score, each commenting about their various major contributions to the industry.  When you have someone that influential, it almost seems like a waste to only give them a few minutes to talk. Hell, any of those people I just mentioned could probably have an entire series dedicated to them.  I guess it's a good problem to have, but it's kind of a shame that you were able to get someone like Roberta Willliams and only have her talk about high level stuff. I would have loved to hear about the early days of Sierra, or about what was going through her head when she was putting together a game as sick and twisted as Phantasmagoria. Side note, how that game didn't cause more controversy, I don't know.

But overall, I still think High Score is worth a watch. There wasn't any new information in here that people who follow this stuff didn't already know, but it's cool to get some insight from true titans of the industry. Even if they don't get much camera time, they make the most of it when they are on the screen.  I also think this would make a great "gaming history 101" for someone that's a more casual gamer or even someone who doesn't game at all.  It's not a video game, so I'm not going to give it a score, but I would definitely recommend.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 10s: Might and Magic VI: The Mandate of Heaven

When I first started writing about games, I was very hesitant to include PC titles at all. As I've said numerous times before, it's just not something I've ever really felt qualified to talk about. There are so many iconic PC games that were just blind spots for me as I never really actively sought them out. If it didn't come on a PC Gamer demo disc or I didn't hear about it through word of mouth, I didn't know about it. Does anyone else remember those PC Gamer demo discs? I had as much fun playing with the UI on them as I did any of the actual demos. Maybe if I spent less time clicking around the secret underground club and more on actually playing the games, I would have had more PC experience. Eh, I'm okay with the fact that while Fallout and Diablo weren't nearly as critical a part of my early gaming life as Coconut Monkey. Even when I did play and enjoy PC games, it was typically because I played the console versions first. Games like Doom, Command ...

Lost Odyssey: Part 2

Last week, we started our look at Lost Odyssey, a title that seemed to break unwritten rules of gaming left and right. We have a traditional RPG, which is the brainchild of the creator of Final Fantasy, released for XBox, a console not known for the genre, at a time when said genre was at what felt like the absolute bottom of its popularity. We started with the story, characters and world, all of which I thought were really good to great. That's a great start for an RPG, where those aspects are very important. But all of that can be undone if the gameplay isn't up to par. It's critical in any generation, but this is an essential aspect to call out in 7th gen RPGs. There was a lot of experimentation going on in the genre at the time, a lot of which didn't yield positive results. I guess I get it, the genre wasn't doing well at the time and developers were trying to do anything they could to bring it back to relevance. Sometimes, that meant terrible gimmicks. Other ti...

The 10s - Resident Evil 4

  "The American Prevailing" is a cliche that only happens in your Hollywood movies. Oh Mr. Kennedy, you entertain me. To show my appreciation, I will help you awaken from your world of cliches." Of all my 10s games, I think Resident Evil 4 may be the one I feel the weirdest about. I know, I know, how could I feel any level weird about Resident Evil 4, one of the most sacred of sacred cows of gaming history. This is one of those games that people will straight up rail you for disliking, as if it's some sort of personal attack. I guess that's starting to change a little bit, it's become a victim of being so popular that people start to hate it just for being so. That always seems to happen in the gaming industry, though that is a different discussion for a different day. Besides, it's not really why I've always had a sort of weird relationship with RE 4. I'm not the first person to say this and I'm certainly not going to last, but it just didn...