Skip to main content

Eye of the Beholder

Eye of the Beholder
 
Hereā€™s the thing about bad games, they arenā€™t all necessarily bad.
 
Wait, what?  Did I just type that?  It may sound like it doesnā€™t make sense, but its true.  A lot of different things can make a game good or bad and not everyone agrees on what is most important.  Sometimes games are bad overall, other times they have one glaring flaw.  Add in the fact that rating games is as subjective as it is objective and you can see what I mean.
 
Image result for eye of the beholder snes

Eye of the Beholder should be a good game.  It has good graphics, solid sound and an interesting premise.  You build out a team of four characters to take on a sewer full of baddies on a mission to destroy the city. Itā€™s a Dungeons & Dragons game, so it follows the rules of that universe.  I have never been a huge D&D fan, but itā€™s still nice to see. 
 
Itā€™s a unique game unlike anything else on the SNES.  Itā€™s difficult to describe, but anyone who has played the Might and Magic games on the PC will find the gameplay instantly familiar.  In fact, this is the port of a DOS game from 1991 (the SNES version came out in 1994).  
 
And therein lies the problem.  This thing is NOT built for an SNES controller.  It just isnā€™t.  For all of the functionality it has, it canā€™t compare to a keyboard and mouse.  This probably wasnā€™t the best game to review, because its really, really difficult to explain.  Long story short, just about every action, from using items to equipping weapons to attacking requires multiple button presses.  Because there are so few buttons on the controller, everything requires those buttons to be pressed in the correct order.  It gets old fast.   
 
Moving around the sewer is fine, but combat is damn near impossible. You will find yourself fumbling with the controller, accidentally bringing up your inventory or turning around while low level goblins whittle away your health.  Of all the games I have played through since I started this project, this is the first one I didnā€™t finish.
 
And its a shame because there is a lot going for it.  I have always love the D & D character customization system.  The graphics are good for their time and at the time, it was rare to see a first person RPG on consoles (hard to believe, isnā€™t it).  This isnā€™t bad like Days of Thunder, which is a lazy, POS cash grab.  That said, the controls made it essentially unplayable.  Maybe this would have been acceptable on the SNES early in its life cycle, but by 1994 there were already tons of console RPGs that were better.   If you are a hardcore D&D fan or you really love games like this, stick to the DOS version.  I might actually try and dig it up some day.  But on SNES, avoid, avoid, avoid.
 
2/10
 
Play this if:
You can actually figure out the controls
You are that hardcore of a D&D fan.  
You absolutely want to give it a try and canā€™t find it on PC
 
Avoid if:
You have access to a better version of the game
You prefer control schemes that arenā€™t rocket surgery

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 10s - Resident Evil 4

  "The American Prevailing" is a cliche that only happens in your Hollywood movies. Oh Mr. Kennedy, you entertain me. To show my appreciation, I will help you awaken from your world of cliches." Of all my 10s games, I think Resident Evil 4 may be the one I feel the weirdest about. I know, I know, how could I feel any level weird about Resident Evil 4, one of the most sacred of sacred cows of gaming history. This is one of those games that people will straight up rail you for disliking, as if it's some sort of personal attack. I guess that's starting to change a little bit, it's become a victim of being so popular that people start to hate it just for being so. That always seems to happen in the gaming industry, though that is a different discussion for a different day. Besides, it's not really why I've always had a sort of weird relationship with RE 4. I'm not the first person to say this and I'm certainly not going to last, but it just didn...

Mega Man V

I've probably covered Mega Man more than any other series here on GOTBP. Yet there is still a lot of uncharted territory for the franchise, territory I am going to start exploring this week. For as much time as I have spent on the series, and as important as it is to my history as a gamer, I've never really explored the Game Boy Mega Man titles. As was the style at the time, pretty much any popular NES/SNES/Genesis game got some level of similar handheld release on the Game Boy/Game Gear. Sometimes these were attempts at straight points, others were instances of the same name but a different game, while others had elements of both. For the most part, the Mega Man Game Boy entries fit into the latter category. They were typically released between NES entries, Mega Man II on the Game Boy between 2 and 3 on the NES, and so on. They would contain elements of the two games they appeared between, the aforementioned Mega Man II would contain four bosses from MM 2 on the NES and four f...

Disco Elysium

  It's time to discuss yet another one of the internet's favorite games. It's not that I hate covering these things, it's that I always worry I'm going to say something that's going to get myself in trouble. I guess I don't have enough followers for that.  Of course, we all know how things can go when you have a difference of opinion with the rest of the internet. All it takes is not liking a game everyone loves to set off a firestorm. That's especially true with some of the more obscure or indie games that tend to have very passionate fanbases. At the same time, I kind of understand some of the backlash to some of these "hot takes." There are so many attention seekers out there that it's hard to tell whether someone genuinely believes these things or whether they are just trolling. Fortunately for me, my opinion on this week's game isn't completely off from what most people seem to think. Unfortunately, it's also one of the fir...