Skip to main content

Star Fox Adventures: Dinosaur Planet

Star Fox Adventures: Dinosaur Planet

I have complained at length on this blog about popular gaming franchises receiving a pass for putting out lousy or even average games.  This is especially true of Nintendo’s first party standbys.

In the 25+ years I have been playing video games, I can count on my hands the number of titles based on Nintendo IPs that received bad reviews.  If you don’t count the CD-I titles (and you shouldn’t), you could probably count them on one hand.  Take Mario Party titles out the equation and its down to one finger.  Look, Nintendo rarely makes bad games, but there are a number of titles from their extensive catalog that would have received an average at best reception if they weren’t Mario/Zelda/Metroid Etc.  All of those Zelda handheld titles come to mind.  Hell, the mainstream gaming media tried to convince us that Mario Clash was worthy of an 8/10 back in the day.

Image result for star fox adventures

Now that I’m done ranting, we can actually talk about this week’s game.  Star Fox Adventures hit the GameCube late in 2002 to quite a bit of fanfare.  Any time Nintendo dusts off one of its first party franchise its going to get attention, but SFA found itself in the gaming news for what it wasn’t rather than what it was.  This was going to be a third person action game like Zelda rather than a flying game like its predecessors.  Fans had been clamoring for a sequel to Star Fox 64 for five years and many were disappointed (or worse) that this wasn’t going to be it.  But hey, its Nintendo, so lets give it a chance.

Graphically, SFA looks pretty good.  The environments are clean and well designed and the character models are similarly well done.  Fox himself looks a little creepy, but overall I can’t complain.  The sound is also good, it kind of feels  like background music but it fits with the game’s atmosphere.  Gameplay is solid, the controls are are pretty tight and it is easy to pull off most of Fox’s wide range of abilities.  It kind of feels like a test version of a Zelda game for better or worse.  

And yet I hated this game.  It isn’t poorly made like “Days of Thunder.”  It didn’t have the butt ugly graphics like “Shadow Madness.”  It wasn’t slow and plodding like “Brothers in Arms.”  Yet Star Fox Adventures commits a cardinal sin of gaming.  An unforgivable discretion that can’t be overlooked.  It’s really, really boring.

Looking good, sounding good or even playing good doesn’t matter if the game is dull.  The environments are boring, the story is boring (its about a lady version of Fox who gets trapped in some sort of crystal or something), the characters are boring, everything is boring.  It’s like they just thought “hey, lets take a half finished Zelda game and just slap Star Fox characters in it!”  It just wasn’t worth spending time on, and that was compounded by the fact that this was such an unnecessary departure for the series.  There was absolutely no reason for this game to have anything to do with Star Fox.  There are a few flying sections, and they are actually pretty well done, but its just a tease for what could have been.

Cross genre games can work, but they need to have a few things going for them.  Chief among those is a cast of compelling characters.  Games like Dissidia or Super Mario RPG work because they feature compelling characters from franchises everyone loves.  People love Star Fox for its gameplay, but no one really cares about the characters.  So without the classic Star Fox gameplay, what do you really have?  A waste of time.  I can’t really give it too bad of a score because its a well made waste of time, but you should still avoid it.

4/10

Play this if:
You have made it your mission to play all of the Zelda clones in existence
You are a diehard Star Fox an

Avoid if:
You value your time
You are looking for an actual Star Fox game
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Valkyrie Profile: Part 1

Since I started creating gaming content, I've promised myself and the few readers I have that I was going to be as honest as possible. I'm going to do that, even if it gets me in trouble. While I try to avoid really ridiculous hot takes, I'm going to absolutely call out games that I don't really like, even if they are otherwise popular. That goes for the popular selections for "hidden gems" or "underrated" games as well. I don't do it often, but I certainly have demonstrated that I have no problem doing it. I did it relatively recently with Yoshi's Island and I've done it in the past with other games like Alundra or Jet Grind Radio. Some of those games I've liked, just not as much as others. Some of them I have actively disliked despite how well regarded they are. Sometimes I get why these games are so beloved (I hated the controls in Yoshi's Island but my goodness is it beautiful and unique). Other times, I don't (Alundra is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance

It's time to keep the GBA Metroidvania train rolling. We started with Castlevania, then moved on to Metroid, and now it's time to make our way back to Dracula's castle. I was pleasantly surprised last year when I, sort of on a whim, decided to take a shot at Castlevania: Circle of the Moon on the Game Boy Advance. I had heard good things about the handheld titles in the series, but never actually took the time to play any of them. And that's a shame, because Circle of the Moon was outstanding. It was truly an exceptional example of just what the tiny but mighty GBA was capable of. It got me excited to dig into the other games in the genre I had missed from that console, both Metroid and Castlevania alike. I moved right along to Metroid: Zero Mission and while I wasn't as high on it as I was COTM, it was still a solid experience that was incredibly well designed and polished. So naturally, the next step in the progression was back to 'Vania with the next in that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Valkyrie Profile: Part 2

Last week, we looked at the story of PS1 RPG Valkyrie Profile, a game that frequently finds its way onto hidden gems lists and other such conversations. I think I made it clear that while it had its high notes, the story and characters were just a bit disappointing for me. So now, it's time to talk about the gameplay. Could this bring the game up? Or will it knock it down to unplayable status? Well, it definitely won't make the game unplayable, but there is a lot to look at here. You see, VP is very, very different from just about any JRPG of its era. Heck, it's pretty different from most entries in the genre ever. I have to give them a ton of credit for originality, though the expirimentation doesn't always land. But there is not denying that, for better or worse, VP is a different breed in terms of combat, exploration, pacing and structure. First, let's start with the combat. Even here, it's probably where you will spend most of your gameplay time. And that...
Post a Comment
Read more