Skip to main content

Rad Racer II

Oh great, another racing game.  

Look, I think I’ve made it pretty clear I don’t really like these things, but they don’t take too much time to play or review.  This one isn’t even that obscure, a lot of folks that played video games in those days have heard of it and its even part of the Nintendo World Championship cartridge.  It wasn’t quite mainstream, but not really off the path either.

I do talk a lot on here about “the name in the corner” with games.  Games are frequently under- or overrated because of who developed or published them, probably more so than any other type of media.  It was true then and it it still true now, even though there are far fewer developers (if you aren’t counting indie developers, of course) than there used to be.  Most of the ones that were around in those days were very specialized and known for making games in only one or two genres.

Image result for rad racer 2


And that’s what makes Rad Racer weird.  You might expect to find a generic NES racing title made by someone like EA or even Nintendo.  But take a look at this:

That’s right, this was published by Square (which is now part of EA, but whatever).  You know, the ones that publish the Final Fantasy series, a trillion other RPGs and not much else?  It’s really weird to see their logo on a racing game.  Or any game that’s not an RPG.  (And yes, I know Chocobo Racing is a thing and also yes, I will review it at some point.)

It’s not like Rad Racer II has any sort of RPG mechanics at all.  It’s literally one single game mode, a time trial race through seven tracks.  There are no power ups, no shortcuts, hell, there aren’t even other people to race against.  All you have to do is reach the end of the track before the time runs out.  There are some drivers on the road who will block your path, but the only other obstacle you face are turns.  In general, I hate time trial modes.  To me, they always feel like tacked on afterthoughts developers throw in just to say they did.  So yeah, this feels like a mini game rather than its own complete title.

That being said, everything here is top quality.  The graphics are great, some of the tracks are more detailed than others but they all look like they areas they are supposed to convey.  The races that take place at night are especially atmospheric with their darkened tracks and blacked out foregrounds.  There isn’t a ton of detail, but Square very clearly put some time and effort into the small touches.  The background in the Big Apple level actually looks like the New York Skyline, complete with the Empire State Building and Twin Towers (always a little sad to see them in old media).  I don’t know much about Las Vegas, but I’m sure similar care was taken in that level as well.

The biggest thing here though is the sense of speed.  Not just speed, but motion in general.  They really do a great job of making you feel like you are moving with the scrolling foregrounds and the fade in/out effects on the other vehicles.  Rather than just a flat course like Day’s of Thunder, Rad Racer’s courses have rolling hills, undulating tracks and hairpin turns.  The background and foreground shift appropriately to give you the illusion that you are really moving.  A lot of modern racing games don’t even do that, so for an NES title its a huge deal.

The control is nice and simple.  A accelerates, B brakes, the D-pad steers.  You can go a little faster by holding up on the D-pad and use earned power charges to get a burst of speed.  This is imperative, as you can’t beat some of the later levels without it.  There are only two music tracks, which is disappointing.  At least the music sounds good.  The game also gives you the opportunity to “sing yourself.”  That’s literally what the game says, not “no music” or “no sound,” “sing yourself.”  Hey, if the game insists, may as well.

I think the biggest problem with Rad Racer II is there just simply isn’t enough here.  Only seven tracks, two songs, one car and one game mode is simply not enough content to make this worth tracking down.  That said, it is one of the more technically impressive NES games I have played.  While there isn’t much to do, what the game does offer is actually quite fun and it isn’t a particularly rare or expensive cartridge. The quality and attention to detail that I have always associated with Square are apparent, even if this game has nothing to do with any of their more modern fare.  This would definitely have scored higher if there was a bit more to do.

4.5/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 10s: Resident Evil CODE:Veronica

Welcome Claire! Consider the area you're in a...special playground I have prepared just for you. Please try and keep me amused, and do not disappoint me by dying too soon! Halloween is here, so that means it's time to get spooky once again. It's been a while, but we're finally getting back to Resident Evil. I am not a huge fan of horror in general, but Resident Evil is one of my all-time favorite gaming franchises. It has the third most games in my personal top 100, behind only Mega Man and Final Fantasy, and is tied with FF for the most games on my 10s list (three apiece, for the record). Last year, I reviewed the absolutely incredible Gamecube remake on Halloween. Maybe next year I'll review Resident Evil 4, another 10/10 that just recently received a big budget remake. Both of those are all time classics, they are not only personal favorites but also important touchstones in the gaming industry as a whole. But, as great as they are, as revolutionary as they were,

Nier: Automata: Part 1

  Let's start with a question. Why are you reading this review? You are just wasting your time. Why am I writing it? In fact, why either of us playing video games at all? None of it means anything. In fact, forget video games. Nothing means anything. Nothing at all. Why bother with life, you may as well just...yeah, I think I need to stop there. Saying that would get me in trouble and besides, who decides what means what anyway? I am going to keep the modern game train running, because I finally got a chance to play yet another one of the internet's favorite games. I have read a lot, like, a lot, about how amazing Nier: Automata was, how it was on a different level in terms of storytelling from just about every game that's ever existed. I've heard it called "the most profound video game ever" and "a truly classic humanist fable." There are countless articles, videos, podcasts, whatever covering just how deep and philosophical the game is. Stop me if

Five Year Anniversary Tournament: Preliminary Round

  All the formalities are over and it's time to get down to business. Let's kick off the GOTBP Five Year Anniversary tournament with round one. We have three matchups this week, all between great games. But I am looking for the best of the best, my favorite game that I've played over the last five years. So, it's time to get this thing kicked off. Preliminary Round Matchup One (6) F-Zero GX vs. (11) Grim Fandango We start with the lowest seed in the bracket, a PC style adventure/point and click title that I reviewed earlier this year. I have to qualify something here, as it is the only game in the bracket with a 9.25 score and one of many titles with that score. I went backed and looked at all the games I had given that score and decided that GF was the best of them, even if only by a small margin. Mega Man X4 and Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon were also in consideration. But honestly, I don't think any of them would have stood a chance in this round. Because F-Zer